“When I was a kid I put a tooth under my pillow, went to sleep, and in the morning there was money there. That tangible evidence was more than enough proof to make me believe in the tooth fairy. To find out how far I could take that premise, I set up a large flash-mob style social experiment all to convince one guy he had turned invisible.” – Justin Willman. Magic For Humans is now streaming on Netflix.

Watch Magic For Humans on Netflix:
https://www.netflix.com/in/Title/80190510

SUBSCRIBE: http://bit.ly/29qBUt7

About Netflix:
Netflix is the world’s leading internet entertainment service with 130 million memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, documentaries and feature films across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can watch as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, on any internet-connected screen. Members can play, pause and resume watching, all without commercials or commitments.

Connect with Netflix Online:
Visit Netflix WEBSITE: http://nflx.it/29BcWb5
Like Netflix Kids on FACEBOOK: http://bit.ly/NetflixFamily
Like Netflix on FACEBOOK: http://bit.ly/29kkAtN
Follow Netflix on TWITTER: http://bit.ly/29gswqd
Follow Netflix on INSTAGRAM: http://bit.ly/29oO4UP
Follow Netflix on TUMBLR: http://bit.ly/29kkemT

Magic for Humans | Justin Willman Makes This Guy Think He’s Invisible | Netflix
http://youtube.com/netflix

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

B (a minor) v. Director of Public Prosecutions | 1 All E.R. 833 (2000)

Many statutes that define crimes describe only the acts that constitute the offense. They often don’t speak of a mental element, or what we often call the mens rea. Does that mean that these offenses don’t have a mental element? The British House of Lords considered that question in B versus Director of Public Prosecutions.

Fifteen-year-old B sat down next to a thirteen-year-old girl on a bus and asked her several times to perform oral sex on him. The girl refused. B was charged in Great Britain’s version of juvenile court with inciting a child under fourteen years old to commit an act of gross indecency, in violation of section 1(1) of the Indecency with Children Act 1960.

B pleaded not guilty. At trial, he offered evidence that he honestly believed the girl to be over fourteen. Had she been fourteen or older, B wouldn’t have been guilty of the charged offense. The trial court ruled that B’s state of mind didn’t constitute a defense to the charge. B then changed his plea to guilty and was duly convicted. B appealed to the Divisional Court, which affirmed. B then appealed to the House of Lords.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/b-a-minor-v-director-of-public-prosecutions

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here: https://www.quimbee.com/cases/b-a-minor-v-director-of-public-prosecutions

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ► https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=QuimbeeDotCom
Quimbee Case Brief App ► https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-overview
Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/quimbeedotcom/
Twitter ► https://twitter.com/quimbeedotcom
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries
Video Rating: / 5